Asko DFI544DXXL or Haier XF 6B2M3PW: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Asko DFI544DXXL
Main drawbackLong eco cycle requires planning when dishes are needed again
Read the full analysis →
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFI544DXXL 9.3 / 10 vs 7.7
By criterion
| Criterion | Asko DFI544DXXL | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 9.4 advantage |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Eco program duration | 9.3 advantage | 7.7 |
| Number of programs | 9.1 | 9.4 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Asko DFI544DXXL | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,6 cm | 59,7 cm |
| Height | 85,9 cm | 85 cm |
| Depth | 55,4 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 16 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 64 kWh/100 cycles | 66 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,2 L/cycle | Not provided |
| Eco program duration | 195 min | 239 min |
| Number of programs | 9 programs | 10 programs |
| Repairability index | Not provided | 9,3 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Fully Integrated | Freestanding |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery drawer |
| Basket layout | Foldable tines | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Intensive wash zone | Half load |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Condensation |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Asko DFI544DXXL
Tied, leading on 1 of the 5 criteria compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.7/10 (195 min vs 239 min)
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Tied, leading on 1 of the 5 criteria compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 8.2/10 (16 place settings vs 14 place settings)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Asko DFI544DXXL or Haier XF 6B2M3PW?
They're neck and neck: 8.7/10 for Asko DFI544DXXL, 8.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 195 min versus 239 min.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFI544DXXL. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 14 place settings.