Beko BDIN18441 or Haier XF 6B2M3PW: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Beko BDIN18441
Main drawbackEco electricity consumption is among the highest declared figures
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.4 / 10 vs 7.7
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Beko BDIN18441 8.4 / 10 vs 7.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Beko BDIN18441 | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 9.4 advantage |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.7 | 8.4 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 8.4 advantage | 7.7 |
| Number of programs | 8.3 | 9.4 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Beko BDIN18441 | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,8 cm | 59,7 cm |
| Height | 81,8 cm | 85 cm |
| Depth | 55 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 16 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75 kWh/100 cycles | 66 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,5 L/cycle | Not provided |
| Eco program duration | 224 min | 239 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | 10 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,1 out of 10 | 9,3 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Fully Integrated | Freestanding |
| Format | Standard | Standard |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery drawer |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Reduced program time | Half load |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Condensation |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Beko BDIN18441
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Eco program duration: 8.4/10 vs 7.7/10 (224 min vs 239 min)
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 3 criteria of 5 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 8.2/10 (16 place settings vs 14 place settings)
- Number of programs: 9.4/10 vs 8.3/10 (10 programs vs 8 programs)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.4/10 vs 7.7/10 (66 kWh/100 cycles vs 75 kWh/100 cycles)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Beko BDIN18441 or Haier XF 6B2M3PW?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 8.2/10 for Beko BDIN18441, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Beko BDIN18441. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Beko BDIN18441. Recorded values: 10 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Beko BDIN18441. Recorded values: 66 kWh/100 cycles versus 75 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Beko BDIN18441 wins on “Eco program duration”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 224 min versus 239 min.