Candy CF 5C6F0W or Haier XF 6B2M3PW: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Noise level”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.5 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.4 / 10 vs 7.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Candy CF 5C6F0W | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9 | 9.4 |
| Noise level | 7.1 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.7 | 8.4 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Number of programs | 8.3 | 9.4 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Candy CF 5C6F0W | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | 59,7 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | 85 cm |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Place settings | 15 place settings | 16 place settings |
| Noise level | 46 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75 kWh/100 cycles | 66 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 10,9 L/cycle | Not provided |
| Eco program duration | 237 min | 239 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | 10 programs |
| Repairability index | 8,6 out of 10 | 9,3 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Color | White | White |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery drawer |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket, Foldable tines | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash options | Half load | Half load |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening, Condensation | Condensation |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Candy CF 5C6F0W
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 3 criteria of 5 compared
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.1/10 (42 decibels vs 46 decibels)
- Number of programs: 9.4/10 vs 8.3/10 (10 programs vs 8 programs)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.4/10 vs 7.7/10 (66 kWh/100 cycles vs 75 kWh/100 cycles)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Candy CF 5C6F0W or Haier XF 6B2M3PW?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.8/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 46 decibels.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 10 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 66 kWh/100 cycles versus 75 kWh/100 cycles.