Hisense HS693A90XAD or Klarstein Amazonia Neo: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Hisense HS693A90XAD
Main drawbackDimensions need careful checking in a small kitchen
Read the full analysis →
Klarstein Amazonia Neo
Main drawbackLimited room when meals involve serving dishes and saucepans
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Hisense HS693A90XAD 9.4 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Noise level”Hisense HS693A90XAD 9.4 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Hisense HS693A90XAD 8.9 / 10 vs 8.1
By criterion
| Criterion | Hisense HS693A90XAD | Klarstein Amazonia Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 advantage | 6.7 |
| Noise level | 9.4 advantage | 6.7 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.9 advantage | 8.1 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Hisense HS693A90XAD | Klarstein Amazonia Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,9 cm | 55 cm |
| Height | 84,6 cm | 59 cm |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | 50 cm |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 8 place settings |
| Noise level | 40 decibels | 49 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 55 kWh/100 cycles | 72,3 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | Not provided | 8 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | Not provided | 220 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 8 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Fully Integrated |
| Energy class | A | F |
| Use | Residential | Residential |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Wash programs | Intensive | Eco |
| Wash options | Reduced program time | Half load |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Hisense HS693A90XAD
Leads on 3 criteria of 3 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 6.7/10 (16 place settings vs 8 place settings)
- Noise level: 9.4/10 vs 6.7/10 (40 decibels vs 49 decibels)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.9/10 vs 8.1/10 (55 kWh/100 cycles vs 72,3 kWh/100 cycles)
Klarstein Amazonia Neo
Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Hisense HS693A90XAD or Klarstein Amazonia Neo?
Hisense HS693A90XAD scores 9.2/10, compared with 8/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Hisense HS693A90XAD wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 8 place settings.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Hisense HS693A90XAD wins on “Noise level”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 40 decibels versus 49 decibels.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Hisense HS693A90XAD wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.9/10 compared with 8.1/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 55 kWh/100 cycles versus 72,3 kWh/100 cycles.
