Neff S175HCX03E or Neff S175EAX16E: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Neff S175HCX03E
Main drawbackVery long eco programme needs planning between meals
Read the full analysis →
Neff S175EAX16E
Main drawbackVery long eco programme when dishes need a quick turnaround
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Neff S175HCX03E 8.2 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Neff S175EAX16E 9.2 / 10 vs 7.7
By criterion
| Criterion | Neff S175HCX03E | Neff S175EAX16E |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 advantage | 7.4 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.7 | 9.2 advantage |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Eco program duration | 6.7 | 7 |
| Number of programs | 7.2 | 7.2 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Neff S175HCX03E | Neff S175EAX16E |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,8 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Height | 81,5 cm | 81,5 cm |
| Depth | 55 cm | 55 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 13 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75 kWh/100 cycles | 54 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9 L/cycle | 9 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 295 min | 270 min |
| Number of programs | 6 programs | 6 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,2 out of 10 | 0,1 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Fully Integrated | Fully Integrated |
| Energy class | C | A |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Reduced program time | Intensive wash zone |
| Door panel fixing | Sliding | Sliding |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Neff S175HCX03E
Tied, leading on 1 of the 6 criteria compared
- Place settings: 8.2/10 vs 7.4/10 (14 place settings vs 13 place settings)
Neff S175EAX16E
Tied, leading on 1 of the 6 criteria compared
- Eco program electricity consumption: 9.2/10 vs 7.7/10 (54 kWh/100 cycles vs 75 kWh/100 cycles)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Neff S175HCX03E or Neff S175EAX16E?
They're neck and neck: 7.9/10 for Neff S175HCX03E, 8/10 for Neff S175EAX16E. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Neff S175EAX16E wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 9.2/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Neff S175HCX03E. Recorded values: 54 kWh/100 cycles versus 75 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Neff S175HCX03E wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Neff S175EAX16E. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 13 place settings.