Head to head

Thomson TDW4510SL2 or Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Thomson TDW4510SL2, studio product shot

Thomson TDW4510SL2

7.9/10

Main drawbackLimited room for serving dishes and larger gatherings' crockery together

Read the full analysis →
Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos, studio product shot

Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos

8.7/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackBulky cookware can still push the available loading space

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Place settings”Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos 8.2 / 10 vs 6.8
  • Priority: “Noise level”Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos 8.5 / 10 vs 7.5
  • Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos 9.2 / 10 vs 8.2
  • Priority: “Eco program duration”Thomson TDW4510SL2 8.8 / 10 vs 8.2

By criterion

Comparison of Thomson TDW4510SL2 and Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos by criterion
Criterion Thomson TDW4510SL2 Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos
Place settings 6.8 8.2 advantage
Noise level 7.5 8.5 advantage
Eco program electricity consumption 8.2 9.2 advantage
Eco program water consumption 8.9 9.2
Eco program duration 8.8 advantage 8.2

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Thomson TDW4510SL2 and Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos
SpecificationThomson TDW4510SL2Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos
Width45 cm59,8 cm
Height85 cm84,5 cm
Depth60 cm60 cm
Place settings10 place settings14 place settings
Noise level44 decibels42 decibels
Eco program electricity consumption67,4 kWh/100 cycles54 kWh/100 cycles
Eco program water consumption9 L/cycle8,4 L/cycle
Eco program duration215 min230 min
Number of programs6 programsNot provided
Repairability indexNot provided9,3 out of 10
Installation typeFreestandingFreestanding
Energy classDA
UseResidentialResidential
End of cycleAutomatic door openingAutomatic door opening
Basket layoutHeight-adjustable upper basketHeight-adjustable upper basket
Wash programsHygieneEco
Wash optionsHalf loadHalf load
Drying technologyAutomatic door openingCondensation

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

Thomson TDW4510SL2

Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared

  • Eco program duration: 8.8/10 vs 8.2/10 (215 min vs 230 min)
View Thomson TDW4510SL2 →

Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos

Leads on 3 criteria of 5 compared

  • Place settings: 8.2/10 vs 6.8/10 (14 place settings vs 10 place settings)
  • Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.5/10 (42 decibels vs 44 decibels)
  • Eco program electricity consumption: 9.2/10 vs 8.2/10 (54 kWh/100 cycles vs 67,4 kWh/100 cycles)
View Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Thomson TDW4510SL2 or Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos?

Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.9/10 for Thomson TDW4510SL2, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Place settings”?

Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Thomson TDW4510SL2. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 10 place settings.

Which wins on “Noise level”?

Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Thomson TDW4510SL2. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 44 decibels.

Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?

Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 9.2/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Thomson TDW4510SL2. Recorded values: 54 kWh/100 cycles versus 67,4 kWh/100 cycles.

Which wins on “Eco program duration”?

Thomson TDW4510SL2 wins on “Eco program duration”: 8.8/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos. Recorded values: 215 min versus 230 min.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it