Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C or Hisense HS693A90XAD: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C
Main drawbackEco electricity consumption among the highest declared figures
Read the full analysis →
Hisense HS693A90XAD
Main drawbackDimensions need careful checking in a small kitchen
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Hisense HS693A90XAD 9.4 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Noise level”Hisense HS693A90XAD 9.4 / 10 vs 8.5
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Hisense HS693A90XAD 8.9 / 10 vs 7.7
- Priority: “Equipment”Hisense HS693A90XAD 8.9 / 10 vs 6.6
By criterion
| Criterion | Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C | Hisense HS693A90XAD |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 9.4 advantage |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 9.4 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.7 | 8.9 advantage |
| Equipment | 6.6 | 8.9 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C | Hisense HS693A90XAD |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 60 cm | 59,9 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | 84,6 cm |
| Depth | 61 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 16 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 40 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75 kWh/100 cycles | 55 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,8 L/cycle | Not provided |
| Eco program duration | 198 min | Not provided |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Energy class | C | A |
| Use | Residential | Residential |
| Wash programs | Eco | Intensive |
| Drying technology | Not disclosed | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C
Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Hisense HS693A90XAD
Leads on 4 criteria of 4 compared
- Equipment: 8.9/10 vs 6.6/10
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 8.2/10 (16 place settings vs 14 place settings)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.9/10 vs 7.7/10 (55 kWh/100 cycles vs 75 kWh/100 cycles)
- Noise level: 9.4/10 vs 8.5/10 (40 decibels vs 42 decibels)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C or Hisense HS693A90XAD?
Hisense HS693A90XAD scores 9.2/10, compared with 8/10 for Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Hisense HS693A90XAD wins on “Equipment”: 8.9/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Hisense HS693A90XAD wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Hisense HS693A90XAD wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.9/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C. Recorded values: 55 kWh/100 cycles versus 75 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Hisense HS693A90XAD wins on “Noise level”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.5/10 for Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C. Recorded values: 40 decibels versus 42 decibels.