Whirlpool W7FHS51X or Haier XF 6B2M3PW: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Whirlpool W7FHS51X
Main drawbackThe 240 min eco programme is inconvenient when dishes need a quick turnaround
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Noise level”Whirlpool W7FHS51X 9.2 / 10 vs 8.5
By criterion
| Criterion | Whirlpool W7FHS51X | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9 | 9.4 |
| Noise level | 9.2 advantage | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Eco program duration | 7.4 | 7.7 |
| Equipment | 8.9 | 8.9 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Whirlpool W7FHS51X | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 60 cm | 59,7 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | 85 cm |
| Depth | 59 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Place settings | 15 place settings | 16 place settings |
| Noise level | 41 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 65 kWh/100 cycles | 66 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,5 L/cycle | Not provided |
| Eco program duration | 240 min | 239 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 10 programs |
| Repairability index | Not provided | 9,3 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Color | Stainless steel | White |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery drawer |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Intensive wash zone | Half load |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Condensation |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Whirlpool W7FHS51X
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Noise level: 9.2/10 vs 8.5/10 (41 decibels vs 42 decibels)
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Whirlpool W7FHS51X or Haier XF 6B2M3PW?
They're neck and neck: 8.5/10 for Whirlpool W7FHS51X, 8.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Whirlpool W7FHS51X wins on “Noise level”: 9.2/10 compared with 8.5/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 41 decibels versus 42 decibels.
