Asko DFI544DXXL or De Dietrich DCJ532DQX: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Asko DFI544DXXL
Main drawbackLong eco cycle requires planning when dishes are needed again
Read the full analysis →
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX
Main drawbackHigh eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”De Dietrich DCJ532DQX 9 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Asko DFI544DXXL 8.8 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFI544DXXL 8.5 / 10 vs 7.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Asko DFI544DXXL | De Dietrich DCJ532DQX |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 9 advantage |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.8 advantage | 7.3 |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.5 advantage | 7.3 |
| Eco program duration | 9.3 | 9.2 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Asko DFI544DXXL | De Dietrich DCJ532DQX |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,6 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 85,9 cm | 82 cm |
| Depth | 55,4 cm | 55 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 15 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 64 kWh/100 cycles | 75,8 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,2 L/cycle | 10 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 195 min | 198 min |
| Number of programs | 9 programs | Not provided |
| Installation type | Fully Integrated | Fully Integrated |
| Energy class | B | C |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Not specified |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Asko DFI544DXXL
Leads on 2 criteria of 5 compared
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.8/10 vs 7.3/10 (64 kWh/100 cycles vs 75,8 kWh/100 cycles)
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7.3/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 10 L/cycle)
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Place settings: 9/10 vs 8.2/10 (15 place settings vs 14 place settings)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Asko DFI544DXXL or De Dietrich DCJ532DQX?
They're neck and neck: 8.7/10 for Asko DFI544DXXL, 8.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX. Recorded values: 64 kWh/100 cycles versus 75,8 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 10 L/cycle.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX wins on “Place settings”: 9/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFI544DXXL. Recorded values: 15 place settings versus 14 place settings.