Brandt DFS1010W or Asko DFI544DXXL: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Brandt DFS1010W
Main drawbackLimited room for large gatherings and their serving dishes
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Asko DFI544DXXL
Main drawbackLong eco cycle requires planning when dishes are needed again
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Asko DFI544DXXL 8.2 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFI544DXXL 8.5 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Asko DFI544DXXL 8.8 / 10 vs 7.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Brandt DFS1010W | Asko DFI544DXXL |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 6.8 | 8.2 advantage |
| Noise level | 6.9 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.3 | 8.8 advantage |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.9 | 8.5 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Brandt DFS1010W | Asko DFI544DXXL |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 44,8 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Height | 84,5 cm | 85,9 cm |
| Depth | 60 cm | 55,4 cm |
| Place settings | 10 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 47 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 76 kWh/100 cycles | 64 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | Not provided | 195 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Fully Integrated |
| Energy class | E | B |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Foldable tines |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Intensive wash zone |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Brandt DFS1010W
Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Asko DFI544DXXL
Leads on 3 criteria of 4 compared
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 6.9/10 (42 decibels vs 47 decibels)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.8/10 vs 7.3/10 (64 kWh/100 cycles vs 76 kWh/100 cycles)
- Place settings: 8.2/10 vs 6.8/10 (14 place settings vs 10 place settings)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Brandt DFS1010W or Asko DFI544DXXL?
Asko DFI544DXXL scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.4/10 for Brandt DFS1010W, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 47 decibels.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 64 kWh/100 cycles versus 76 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 10 place settings.