Brandt DFS1010W or Haier XF 6B2M3PW: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Brandt DFS1010W
Main drawbackLimited room for large gatherings and their serving dishes
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Noise level”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.5 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.4 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority: “Equipment”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.9 / 10 vs 7.2
By criterion
| Criterion | Brandt DFS1010W | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 6.8 | 9.4 advantage |
| Noise level | 6.9 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.3 | 8.4 advantage |
| Equipment | 7.2 | 8.9 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Brandt DFS1010W | Haier XF 6B2M3PW |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 44,8 cm | 59,7 cm |
| Height | 84,5 cm | 85 cm |
| Depth | 60 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Place settings | 10 place settings | 16 place settings |
| Noise level | 47 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 76 kWh/100 cycles | 66 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9 L/cycle | Not provided |
| Eco program duration | Not provided | 239 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 10 programs |
| Repairability index | Not provided | 9,3 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Color | White | White |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery drawer |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Half load |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Brandt DFS1010W
Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 4 criteria of 4 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 6.8/10 (16 place settings vs 10 place settings)
- Equipment: 8.9/10 vs 7.2/10
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 6.9/10 (42 decibels vs 47 decibels)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.4/10 vs 7.3/10 (66 kWh/100 cycles vs 76 kWh/100 cycles)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Brandt DFS1010W or Haier XF 6B2M3PW?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.4/10 for Brandt DFS1010W, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 10 place settings.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Equipment”: 8.9/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Brandt DFS1010W.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 47 decibels.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 66 kWh/100 cycles versus 76 kWh/100 cycles.