Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.7
By criterion
| Criterion | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 advantage | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.4 | 8 |
| Eco program duration | 7.7 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 9.4 | 9.1 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 66 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | Not provided | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 239 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 10 programs | 9 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,3 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Reduced program time |
| Drying technology | Condensation | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Tied, leading on 1 of the 5 criteria compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 8.2/10 (16 place settings vs 14 place settings)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Tied, leading on 1 of the 5 criteria compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.7/10 (195 min vs 239 min)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Asko DFS344ID.S?
They're neck and neck: 8.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW, 8.6/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 195 min versus 239 min.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 14 place settings.