Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Beko BDEN38441WA: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Beko BDEN38441WA
Main drawbackAverage declared noise is the main compromise for a kitchen sharing living space
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Noise level”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.5 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.4 / 10 vs 7.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Beko BDEN38441WA |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 advantage | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 8.5 advantage | 7.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.4 advantage | 7.7 |
| Number of programs | 9.4 advantage | 8.3 |
| Equipment | 8.9 | 8.9 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Beko BDEN38441WA |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | 85 cm |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | 60 cm |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 44 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 66 kWh/100 cycles | 75 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program duration | 239 min | Not provided |
| Number of programs | 10 programs | 8 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,3 out of 10 | 9,1 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Format | Standard | Standard |
| Color | White | White |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Reduced program time |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 4 criteria of 5 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 8.2/10 (16 place settings vs 14 place settings)
- Number of programs: 9.4/10 vs 8.3/10 (10 programs vs 8 programs)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.5/10 (42 decibels vs 44 decibels)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.4/10 vs 7.7/10 (66 kWh/100 cycles vs 75 kWh/100 cycles)
Beko BDEN38441WA
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Beko BDEN38441WA?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 8.1/10 for Beko BDEN38441WA, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Beko BDEN38441WA. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Beko BDEN38441WA. Recorded values: 10 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Beko BDEN38441WA. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 44 decibels.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Beko BDEN38441WA. Recorded values: 66 kWh/100 cycles versus 75 kWh/100 cycles.