Haier XF 6B2M3PW or De Dietrich DCJ532DQX: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX
Main drawbackHigh eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.4 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority: “Eco program duration”De Dietrich DCJ532DQX 9.2 / 10 vs 7.7
By criterion
| Criterion | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | De Dietrich DCJ532DQX |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 | 9 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.4 advantage | 7.3 |
| Eco program duration | 7.7 | 9.2 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | De Dietrich DCJ532DQX |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | 82 cm |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | 55 cm |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 15 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 66 kWh/100 cycles | 75,8 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | Not provided | 10 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 239 min | 198 min |
| Number of programs | 10 programs | Not provided |
| Repairability index | 9,3 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Fully Integrated |
| Drying technology | Condensation | Not specified |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Tied, leading on 1 of the 4 criteria compared
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.4/10 vs 7.3/10 (66 kWh/100 cycles vs 75,8 kWh/100 cycles)
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX
Tied, leading on 1 of the 4 criteria compared
- Eco program duration: 9.2/10 vs 7.7/10 (198 min vs 239 min)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Haier XF 6B2M3PW or De Dietrich DCJ532DQX?
They're neck and neck: 8.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW, 8.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.2/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 198 min versus 239 min.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX. Recorded values: 66 kWh/100 cycles versus 75,8 kWh/100 cycles.