Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Gaggenau DF480101: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Gaggenau DF480101
Main drawbackVery long eco programme is poorly suited to getting dishes back quickly
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Noise level”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.5 / 10 vs 7.8
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 7.7 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Gaggenau DF480101 |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 advantage | 7.1 |
| Noise level | 8.5 advantage | 7.8 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Eco program duration | 7.7 advantage | 6.7 |
| Number of programs | 9.4 advantage | 8.3 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Gaggenau DF480101 |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | Not provided |
| Height | 85 cm | 81,5 cm |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | Not provided |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 12 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 43 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 66 kWh/100 cycles | 62,6 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | Not provided | 9,5 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 239 min | 295 min |
| Number of programs | 10 programs | 8 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,3 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Fully Integrated |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Half load |
| Drying technology | Condensation | Zeolite |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 4 criteria of 5 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 7.1/10 (16 place settings vs 12 place settings)
- Number of programs: 9.4/10 vs 8.3/10 (10 programs vs 8 programs)
- Eco program duration: 7.7/10 vs 6.7/10 (239 min vs 295 min)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.8/10 (42 decibels vs 43 decibels)
Gaggenau DF480101
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Gaggenau DF480101?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.8/10 for Gaggenau DF480101, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 12 place settings.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 10 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program duration”: 7.7/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 239 min versus 295 min.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.8/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 43 decibels.