Haier XF 6B2M3PW or High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C
Main drawbackAbove-average water consumption on eco
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Noise level”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.5 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.4 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Eco program duration”High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C 9 / 10 vs 7.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 6.6
By criterion
| Criterion | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 advantage | 7.1 |
| Noise level | 8.5 advantage | 6.7 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.4 advantage | 7.1 |
| Eco program duration | 7.7 | 9 advantage |
| Number of programs | 9.4 advantage | 6.6 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | Not provided |
| Height | 85 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | Not provided |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 12 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 49 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 66 kWh/100 cycles | 82 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | Not provided | 11 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 239 min | 210 min |
| Number of programs | 10 programs | 4 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,3 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Fully Integrated |
| Wash programs | Eco | Intensive, Quick, Eco |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 4 criteria of 5 compared
- Number of programs: 9.4/10 vs 6.6/10 (10 programs vs 4 programs)
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 7.1/10 (16 place settings vs 12 place settings)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 6.7/10 (42 decibels vs 49 decibels)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.4/10 vs 7.1/10 (66 kWh/100 cycles vs 82 kWh/100 cycles)
High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Eco program duration: 9/10 vs 7.7/10 (210 min vs 239 min)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Haier XF 6B2M3PW or High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.2/10 for High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.6/10 for High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C. Recorded values: 10 programs versus 4 programs.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 7.1/10 for High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 12 place settings.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 6.7/10 for High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 49 decibels.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.4/10 compared with 7.1/10 for High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C. Recorded values: 66 kWh/100 cycles versus 82 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
High One FBI 12S49 D WAD929C wins on “Eco program duration”: 9/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 210 min versus 239 min.
