Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Klarstein Amazonia Neo: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Klarstein Amazonia Neo
Main drawbackLimited room when meals involve serving dishes and saucepans
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Noise level”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 8.5 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Klarstein Amazonia Neo 8.6 / 10 vs 7.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Klarstein Amazonia Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 advantage | 6.7 |
| Noise level | 8.5 advantage | 6.7 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Eco program duration | 7.7 | 8.6 advantage |
| Number of programs | 9.4 advantage | 8.3 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Haier XF 6B2M3PW | Klarstein Amazonia Neo |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | 55 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | 59 cm |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | 50 cm |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 8 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 decibels | 49 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 66 kWh/100 cycles | 72,3 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | Not provided | 8 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 239 min | 220 min |
| Number of programs | 10 programs | 8 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,3 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Fully Integrated |
| Format | Standard | Compact |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Half load |
| Drying technology | Condensation | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW
Leads on 3 criteria of 5 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 6.7/10 (16 place settings vs 8 place settings)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 6.7/10 (42 decibels vs 49 decibels)
- Number of programs: 9.4/10 vs 8.3/10 (10 programs vs 8 programs)
Klarstein Amazonia Neo
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Eco program duration: 8.6/10 vs 7.7/10 (220 min vs 239 min)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Klarstein Amazonia Neo?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 8/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 8 place settings.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 49 decibels.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 10 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Klarstein Amazonia Neo wins on “Eco program duration”: 8.6/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 220 min versus 239 min.