Head to head

Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Neff S175EAX16E: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Haier XF 6B2M3PW, studio product shot

Haier XF 6B2M3PW

8.7/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackLengthy eco programme is awkward when clean dishes are needed soon

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Neff S175EAX16E, studio product shot

Neff S175EAX16E

8/10

Main drawbackVery long eco programme when dishes need a quick turnaround

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Place settings”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 7.4
  • Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Neff S175EAX16E 9.2 / 10 vs 8.4
  • Priority: “Eco program duration”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 7.7 / 10 vs 7
  • Priority: “Number of programs”Haier XF 6B2M3PW 9.4 / 10 vs 7.2

By criterion

Comparison of Haier XF 6B2M3PW and Neff S175EAX16E by criterion
Criterion Haier XF 6B2M3PW Neff S175EAX16E
Place settings 9.4 advantage 7.4
Noise level 8.5 8.5
Eco program electricity consumption 8.4 9.2 advantage
Eco program duration 7.7 advantage 7
Number of programs 9.4 advantage 7.2

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Haier XF 6B2M3PW and Neff S175EAX16E
SpecificationHaier XF 6B2M3PWNeff S175EAX16E
Width59,7 cm59,8 cm
Height85 cm81,5 cm
Depth59,8 cm55 cm
Place settings16 place settings13 place settings
Noise level42 decibels42 decibels
Eco program electricity consumption66 kWh/100 cycles54 kWh/100 cycles
Eco program water consumptionNot provided9 L/cycle
Eco program duration239 min270 min
Number of programs10 programs6 programs
Repairability index9,3 out of 100,1 out of 10
Installation typeFreestandingFully Integrated
End of cycleAutomatic door openingAutomatic door opening
Cutlery storageCutlery drawerCutlery basket
Basket layoutHeight-adjustable upper basketHeight-adjustable upper basket
Wash programsEcoEco
Wash optionsHalf loadIntensive wash zone
Drying technologyCondensationAutomatic door opening

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

Haier XF 6B2M3PW

Leads on 3 criteria of 5 compared

  • Number of programs: 9.4/10 vs 7.2/10 (10 programs vs 6 programs)
  • Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 7.4/10 (16 place settings vs 13 place settings)
  • Eco program duration: 7.7/10 vs 7/10 (239 min vs 270 min)
View Haier XF 6B2M3PW →

Neff S175EAX16E

Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared

  • Eco program electricity consumption: 9.2/10 vs 8.4/10 (54 kWh/100 cycles vs 66 kWh/100 cycles)
View Neff S175EAX16E →
Neff S175EAX16ENo verified partner offers for this modelRead the full analysis

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Haier XF 6B2M3PW or Neff S175EAX16E?

Haier XF 6B2M3PW scores 8.7/10, compared with 8/10 for Neff S175EAX16E, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Number of programs”?

Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.4/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Neff S175EAX16E. Recorded values: 10 programs versus 6 programs.

Which wins on “Place settings”?

Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Neff S175EAX16E. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 13 place settings.

Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?

Neff S175EAX16E wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 9.2/10 compared with 8.4/10 for Haier XF 6B2M3PW. Recorded values: 54 kWh/100 cycles versus 66 kWh/100 cycles.

Which wins on “Eco program duration”?

Haier XF 6B2M3PW wins on “Eco program duration”: 7.7/10 compared with 7/10 for Neff S175EAX16E. Recorded values: 239 min versus 270 min.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it