Klarstein Amazonia Neo or Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Klarstein Amazonia Neo
Main drawbackLimited room when meals involve serving dishes and saucepans
Read the full analysis →
Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos
Main drawbackBulky cookware can still push the available loading space
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos 8.2 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Noise level”Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos 8.5 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos 9.2 / 10 vs 8.1
By criterion
| Criterion | Klarstein Amazonia Neo | Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 6.7 | 8.2 advantage |
| Noise level | 6.7 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.1 | 9.2 advantage |
| Eco program water consumption | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Eco program duration | 8.6 | 8.2 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Klarstein Amazonia Neo | Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 55 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Height | 59 cm | 84,5 cm |
| Depth | 50 cm | 60 cm |
| Place settings | 8 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 49 decibels | 42 decibels |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 72,3 kWh/100 cycles | 54 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 8 L/cycle | 8,4 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 220 min | 230 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | Not provided |
| Repairability index | Not provided | 9,3 out of 10 |
| Installation type | Fully Integrated | Freestanding |
| Energy class | F | A |
| Use | Residential | Residential |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery drawer |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Half load |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Condensation |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Klarstein Amazonia Neo
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos
Leads on 3 criteria of 5 compared
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 6.7/10 (42 decibels vs 49 decibels)
- Place settings: 8.2/10 vs 6.7/10 (14 place settings vs 8 place settings)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 9.2/10 vs 8.1/10 (54 kWh/100 cycles vs 72,3 kWh/100 cycles)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Klarstein Amazonia Neo or Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos?
Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos scores 8.7/10, compared with 8/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 42 decibels versus 49 decibels.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 8 place settings.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Miele G 7600 SC AutoDos wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 9.2/10 compared with 8.1/10 for Klarstein Amazonia Neo. Recorded values: 54 kWh/100 cycles versus 72,3 kWh/100 cycles.